Saturday, November 11, 2006

Hydrogen Peroxide and Bird Flu

How to Survive the Coming(?) Bird Flu Pandemic
Jump to: navigation, search
Disclaimer: Due the various government agencies regulating free speech in health and medicine, The Center for Truth in Medicine cannot say if ascorbic acid or H2O2 have any use whatsoever in the treatment of anything. All the views expressed are the personal views of visitors to this website or the quoted individual. Full disclaimer
"Society just can't accept the idea that 50 percent of the population could die. And I think we have to face that possibility." [1] - Robert G. Webster, world-renowned virologist.
The world on the brink of the Abyss
The world is on the brink of an abyss, a global health threat so great that it threatens modern society and the human species. The abyss is bird flu. The next pandemic could start at any moment.
When it starts, the world's most deadly virus, H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza, will race around the planet within days. As many as 80% of those infected may die.
Some expect that when the pandemic starts, everything else will stop. Everything we take for granted, public services, public utilities, gas, electricity, the food distribution system, emergency services, the healthcare system. Those who survive the virus may die in the chaos and violence that follows.
This website presents an alternative viewpoint on the treatment of bird flu. Some doctors and scientists believe that pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines are not the answer to treating bird flu. They support this position with the research and clinical studies of some of the world's most repected doctors and scientists, including:
Linus Pauling, Ph.D. - The only person in history to win two unshared Nobel Prizes, Dr. Pauling has been included in a list of the 20 greatest scientists of all time, with Albert Einstein being the only other scientist from the twentieth century on the list. He was called one of the greatest thinkers and visionaries of the millennium, along with Galileo, Newton, and Einstein. Dr. Pauling wrote, edited, or contributed to nearly fifty books, published over 1,000 articles. [2]
Albert Szent-Györgyi, MD, Ph.D. - Winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine for his study of vitamin C and cell respiration, and founder of the National Foundation for Cancer Research, Szent-Györgyi was a member of many scientifc societies, a Past President of the Academy of Sciences, Vice-President of the National Academy, and Visiting Professor at Harvard University. He received the Cameron Prize in 1946 and the Lasker Award in 1954. [3]
Matthias Rath, MD - A world-renowned Physician and Research Scientist, Dr. Rath's research discoveries have proven the correlation between vitamin deficiency and cardiovascular disease and cancer. [4] Working with Dr. Linus Pauling, Dr. Rath discovered that only 3 grams a day of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is sufficient to prevent heart disease, the #1 leading cause of death in the United States. [5] [6] His work has been published in many professional journals including The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science and The Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine and Atherosclerosis.
Frederick R. Klenner, MD - A pioneer in orthomolecular medicine, Dr. Klenner has been called one of the most innovative physicians of all time. [7] He demonstrated that intravenous vitamin C cures or ameliorates more than 30 diseases, and consistently cured chicken pox, measles, mumps, tetanus and polio using the vitamin in the early 1940's, a time when vaccines were not widely available. [8]
Charles Farr, MD, Ph.D. - Dr. Farr was nominated to receive the 1993 Nobel Prize for Medicine for his work in the field of biological oxidation and hydrogen peroxide therapy, and has been a pioneer in many areas of comprehensive health care, including nutrition and computer diet analysis. [9] Dr. Farr's research demonstrated that intravenous hydrogen peroxide increases the body's metabolic rate by 100%. [10] He is the director of the International Bio-Oxidative Medicine Foundation.
Others influential doctors and researchers include Dr Robert F. Cathcart III, Dr. Abram Hoffer, Dr. William Campbell Douglas, Dr. Nathaniel Altman, Dr. T.H. Oliver, Dr. B.C. Cantab, Dr. D.V. Murphy, Dr. Ron Kennedy, Dr. Clif Arrington, Irwin Stone, Dr. Thomas Levy, Dr. Vargas Magne, Dr. H. Clay Gorton, Dr. Kelly Jarvis, Dr. Mark Levine, Dr. Steve Hickey, Dr. Hilary Roberts, and Dr. Rima E. Laibow, to name a few.
1 Introduction
2 Executive Summary
3 Evaluation Criteria for Treatments
4 Evidence supporting the use of intravenous hydrogen peroxide against bird flu
4.1 Harrowing circumstances
4.2 First patient shows a remarkable recovery
4.3 Foundation for a new therapy
4.4 Physicians cite effectiveness against flu and other viral diseases
4.5 A closer look at hydrogen peroxide
4.6 Critics of hydrogen peroxide therapy
4.7 Possible side effects of hydrogen peroxide therapy
4.8 Why isn't intravenous hydrogen peroxide already in use?
4.9 Public trust in the system
5 References
6 Brief Disclaimer
if (window.showTocToggle) { var tocShowText = "show"; var tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle(); }

The goal of this article is to determine the best possible treatments for bird flu using the available scientific evidence.
This article includes contributions from scientists, doctors, researchers, and readers like you. Anyone may contribute to this article. To contribute, click on the link marked Log in / create account in the upper right of this web page. Once an account is created, links will appear that enable the editing of the content that appears on this and every other page of this domain. Additions and changes will be subject to peer review, and may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors.
Executive Summary
The ideal bird flu treatment would be capable of reducing the mortality rate of a lethal bird flu virus in humans. Based on their own clinical experience and supporting evidence in the medical literature, some doctors and scientists believe intravenous hydrogen peroxide to be the best treatment option against bird flu. [11] [12] Attention! One scientist has proposed a topical solution that may offer an alternative to intravenous hydrogen peroxide. See members' area for details. Other scientists and doctors believe intravenous vitamin C is superior to intravenous hydrogen peroxide, citing the greater number of clinical studies supporting the use of C against viral infections. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
Here is a comparison of intravenous hydrogen peroxide and intravenous vitamin C against bird flu. The antiviral drug Tamiflu is included in the table for the purpose of comparison:
Intravenous hydrogen peroxide NEW! Transdermal delivery
Intravenous vitamin C and massive oral doses
Tamiflu (for comparison)
Measurable reduction in mortality, reliable data sample
Yes - Saved a majority of 24 late-stage critically ill patients infected with a lethal bird flu virus. Patients showed rapid reduction in fever, improved mental, cardiovascular, respiratory function. No ill effects reported. [11]
Limited - 85% reduction in flu symptoms in 488 person controlled study. [18] Marked improvement in 90% of 130 cases of flu using 45 grams. [13] Successful treatment of 41 cases of viral pneumonia flu using massive oral and IV doses. [15] [16]
No data
Effective when administered in latter stages of illness
Resistant to gastrointestinal interference
Yes - intravenous
Yes - intravenous
No - oral
Adverse reactions and/or side effects
See below
See below
Aches and pains, Allergic reactions sometimes leading to shock, Asthma - aggravation of pre-existing asthma, Bronchitis, Chest infection, Conjunctivitis, Dermatitis, Diarrhea, Difficulty sleeping, Dizziness, Ear infection, Ear problems, Erythema multiforme, Headache, Hepatitis, Indigestion, Liver problems, Lymphadenopathy, Nausea, Nose bleed, Rash or rashes, Runny nose, Sinusitis, Stevens Johnson syndrome, Symptoms of a cold, Tiredness, Tummy pain, Urticaria, Vomiting [19]
Affordable for developing countries
Yes - under $1/treatment
Yes - under $3/treatment
No - $100 per treatment
Widely available or easily produced
No [20]
Charles Farr (nominee for the Nobel prize in medicine), William Campbell Douglas, Nathaniel Altman,T.H. Oliver, B.C. Cantab, D.V. Murphy, Ron Kennedy, Clif Arrington
Linus Pauling (Nobel Laureate), Albert Szent-Gyorgyi (Nobel Laureate), Frederick R. Klenner, Robert F. Cathcart, Irwin Stone, Thomas Levy, Mathias Rath, Vargas Magne, H. Clay Gorton, Kelly Jarvis, Mark Levine, Rima E. Laibow
Roche Pharmaceuticals, NIH, CDC, WHO, FDA
It is difficult to determine which is more effective against bird flu: intravenous hydrogen peroxide or intravenous vitamin C. A clinical study comparing both, along with the antiviral drug Tamiflu, against H5N1 bird flu may provide information that would, if acted upon, save millions of lives during the pandemic.
Overall, there are fewer clinical references supporting the use of intravenous hydrogen peroxide. However, while intravenous vitamin C appears to be effective against influenza and other viral illnesses, some evidence suggests that intravenous hydrogen peroxide can dramatically reduce the mortality rate of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
It is possible that an ideal protocol would combine both. While vitamin C is an antioxidant and hydrogen peroxide is an oxidant, recent studies show that these compounds work collaboratively: intravenous vitamin C increases hydrogen peroxide levels in the body. In 2005, research by the National Institutes of Health showed that intravenous vitamin C was effective in killing cancer cells by delivering hydrogen peroxide to the tissues. The authors noted: "These findings give plausibility to intravenous ascorbic acid in cancer treatment, and have unexpected implications for treatment of infections where H2O2 may be beneficial." [21]
Evaluation Criteria for Treatments
Treatments are evaluated according to the following criteria:
Data reliability - sample size, data source
Effectiveness - net reduction in mortality
Strength - effectiveness when administered in latter stages of illness
Impact - potential for and degree of gastrointestinal interference
Adverse reports - adverse reactions and/or side effects
Affordability - economic feasibility for the poor in developing countries
Supply - availability and production capacity to treat world's population
In other words, the best treatment would be a treatment that:
Has been shown effective across a large group
Greatly reduces the mortality rate of bird flu
Is effective even when administered in late stages in the illness
Works irrespective of gastrointestinal interference
Has very few or no adverse reactions and/or side effects
Is affordable to the poorest people in developing countries
Is available or easily produced in quantities necessary to treat world's population

Evidence supporting the use of intravenous hydrogen peroxide against bird flu
One of the most remarkable articles to appear in a medical journal is the article entitled "Influenza Pneumonia: The Intravenous Injection of Hydrogen Peroxide," which appeared in the respected British medical journal The Lancet. [11]
The article is remarkable for several reasons.
First, it is the only reference in the medical literature that amounts to a clinical trial using human subjects infected with a highly pathogenic bird flu virus. While there are many references to promising influenza treatments in the medical literature, nearly all cite mouse-model or in vitro (test tube) experiments rather than human subjects.
Second, it is exceptional because doctors attempted to treat dying patients with a new and experimental agent, a common household chemical, rather than an approved pharmaceutical drug.
Third, it is exceptional because the treatment seemed to produce remarkable recoveries in a majority of patients infected with a deadly bird flu virus.
Fourth, it is exceptional because the treatment seemed effective despite being administered late in the stage of the illness. This is significant because established influenza treatments such as antiviral drugs must be administered early - within the first 48 hours of infection - to have any impact on the course of the disease.
Fifth, it is exceptional because the deadly "Spanish flu" virus, presumably the same virus that is described in The Lancet article, is genetically similar to the H5N1 bird flu virus that is causing great concern around the globe. [12]
This would make the treatment published in The Lancet even more relevant because if these two viruses are genetically similar, a treatment capable of stopping the deadly bird flu virus described in the article may have a high probability of stopping bird flu.
Harrowing circumstances
The Lancet article describes the kind of harrowing circumstances doctors around the world may soon face when the bird flu pandemic strikes: a ward full of patients so ill they are either comatose or delirious; patients in such agony they have to be restrained in their beds.
The death rate from this particular influenza virus was approximately 80%, roughly equivalent to the death rate associated with the H5N1 bird flu virus. Many of the patients were in the last stages of the illness.
"So useless were the usual remedies... that we felt justified in giving a trial to any method which held out a prospect of success," the doctors wrote.
Unfettered by the legal liabilities that would have made such an experiment unthinkable today, the doctors took 2 ounces of a hydrogen peroxide, mixed it with 8 ounces of normal saline solution, and administered the experimental solution intravenously to the worst case in their ward of dying patients.
First patient shows a remarkable recovery
"The first case... [had] broncho-pneumonia of influenzal origin and was intensely toxaemic. He had been delirious for two days previously, and was selected as being the worst case in the ward and to all appearances moribund..." wrote the doctors.
Within 6 hours of administration, the man who had been dying and so delirious he had to be tied to his bed, sat up and asked for food. Almost immediately his fever of 101.8 fell to normal. The patient's improvement in condition was remarkable, if not miraculous.
Encouraged by this recovery, the doctors tried the treatment on another 24 of their sickest patients in the ward.
Ultimately, more than half of the dying patients showed immediate improvements and survived.
The vitals signs of the patients were carefully monitored. Those receiving the hydrogen peroxide infusions showed a rapid reduction in fever and improved mental, cardiovascular, and respiratory function. No serious side effects were reported.
Not only did the treatment appear to be effective, but it was effective in treating dying patients in the final stages of the illness, a feat no modern antiviral drug can match.
Foundation for a new therapy
While obscure and largely forgotten, the article in The Lancet became one of the foundations for a new, unapproved medical therapy. Some physicians took notice and began to try intravenous hydrogen peroxide therapy in their practices. Attention! There is a solution that, when applied to the skin, may deliver hydrogen peroxide to the bloodstream as effectively as intravenous administration. See members' area for details.
Since 1920, doctors have administered intravenous hydrogen peroxide to treat a wide range of afflictions including influenza, chronic pain, influenza, cancer, diabetes, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and arthritis. The use of hydrogen peroxide has been the subject of hundreds of articles in the scientific medical literature, as well as books with titles like Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle [22] and Flood your Body with Oxygen. [23] A search on Google for the keyword combination "hydrogen peroxide" and "influenza" yields 319,000 results.
Some patients swear by the therapy, claiming it has cured or improved conditions that drugs and orthodox treatments did not help.
Physicians cite effectiveness against flu and other viral diseases
While there have been no large-scale clinical trials of hydrogen peroxide against influenza, other physicians have corroborated the results published in The Lancet.
One of these physicians is William Campbell Douglass, M.D., author of the book Hydrogen Peroxide: Medical Miracle. In his book Douglass related cases of flu treated with hydrogen peroxide:
"A 67-year-old man came to the Farr Clinic complaining of fever, chills, sore throat, cough, and aching in the bones for 12 hours; a typical case of viremia, the flu, or, in popular parlance, the crud. He was placed on an H2O2 drip. His temperature was 102 at the beginning of the treatment. The next day his temperature was down to 101, and another treatment was given. Before the infusion was finished, his temperature had returned to normal and he was completely free of symptoms. The following day he returned to work and remained well.
One of my patients... was scheduled to go to Dallas in two days for an assignment. She came in with red eyes, a runny red nose, and a fever of 101... She was started on a peroxide drip and given 10mg of Coenzyme Q10 by mouth to help the oxygen delivery. The next morning she was 90% well, and the following morning, the day for departure to Dallas, she was completely well."
Douglas reported that he had seen many similar cases of flu resolve rapidly with hydrogen peroxide therapy. "We could relate many similar 'flu stories,' but it would be monotonous reading: first day sick, second day 90% well, and third day back to normal. I have never seen anything like it," he wrote. [24]
A closer look at hydrogen peroxide
Hydrogen peroxide is widely known as a household disinfectant, a mouthwash or cleaner for light skin wounds. It is not FDA-approved for internal use. Here are some facts about hydrogen peroxide that are not widely known:
Hydrogen peroxide is present or produced by almost every cell in the human body [25] [26]
Hydrogen peroxide is used by the immune system as a first line of defense against viruses, bacteria, and other invaders
Hydrogen peroxide has been proven to kill a wide range of viruses, including the influenza virus [27]
Hydrogen peroxide is produced by the "good bacteria" in the human gut to prevent the proliferation of invading bacteria and yeast infections
Hydrogen peroxide, when injected, stimulates the body's enzyme systems and causes the human metabolic rate to increase 100%
Hydrogen peroxide, when injected, increases oxygen levels in the body to levels as high as those achieved with a hyperbaric oxygen chamber
This last fact is particularly important, because all viruses, including the bird flu virus, are anaerobic. Anaerobic viruses are unique in that they cannot live in the presence of oxygen.
The British physicians who used hydrogen peroxide to treat patients dying from lethal influenza noted this fact. In fact, they hypothesized that hydrogen peroxide administered intravenously might not only supply critically needed oxygen but destroy the circulating virus and toxins by oxidation in much same the way that the body's own natural defense system does.
Based on the positive outcome of the treatment, the doctor's hypothesis may be correct.
Critics of hydrogen peroxide therapy
Powerful organizations, including some of the largest mass media organizations, have attacked intravenous hydrogen peroxide therapy.
Without citing scientific references, The American Cancer Society (ACS) alleges that "Hydrogen peroxide injections can have dangerous side effects. High blood levels of hydrogen peroxide can create oxygen bubbles that block blood flow and cause gangrene and death. Destruction of blood cells has also been reported after intravenous injection of hydrogen peroxide." Without citing cases, the ACS further alleges that "The medical literature contains several accounts of patient deaths attributed directly to oxygen therapy." [28]
Proponents of the therapy refute these allegations:
Hydrogen peroxide is present or produced by almost every cell in the human body, and is key factor in the immune system. It therefore cannot possibly be intrinsically toxic to the human body. [25] [26]
When intravenously administered into the body, hydrogen peroxide breaks down into two non-toxic components, water and oxygen.
Nobody disputes that high levels of hydrogen peroxide can be dangerous; Proponents of hydrogen peroxide therapy note that 35% hydrogen peroxide can burn the skin and is dangerous to ingest, while 90% hydrogen peroxide has been used as rocket fuel. However, the solution used in intravenous hydrogen peroxide therapy is highly dilute, typically 0.0375 to 0.1% hydrogen peroxide.
There have been no large-scale clinical studies conducted that show that intravenous hydrogen peroxide is, in fact, dangerous. While no one can claim it is a proven medical treatment, the converse is also true.
While there have been cases where families or patients have tried to collect money by filing lawsuits alleging harm from the treatment, there is no published clinical evidence to support these claims.
Some observers also allege that some of the most vocal critics of hydrogen peroxide therapy have a vested interest in suppressing the therapy. For example, in the case of the American Cancer Society, they allege that:
A large proportion of ACS revenues come from large pharmaceutical and cancer industry companies, companies whose profits would be threatened should an inexpensive, unpatentable treatment like intravenous hydrogen peroxide prove effective. [29]
the ACS board of directors includes corporate executives from the pharmaceutical companies, companies whose profits would be threatened by inexpensive, non-drug treatments [30] [29]
ACS regularly conducts highly publicized attacks against treatments that could potentially compete with expensive cancer drugs, a $12 billion dollar industry. [29] [31]
ACS has a history of opposing regulations against products and chemicals that were suspected of causing cancer. [29] [32]
Possible side effects of hydrogen peroxide therapy
Scientists and doctors have noted some side effects and risks associated with hydrogen peroxide therapy.
In one case reported in the British Medical Journal, a man developed an embolism after doctors pumped 3% hydrogen peroxide into a wound in his side. The patient recovered, and experts' note in the case of hydrogen peroxide, an embolus is pure oxygen, which normally dissolves into the tissues. A pure oxygen embolus should not be confused with an air embolus, which consists of primarily nitrogen, does not dissolve, and is indeed dangerous. [33] The case in question was not an intravenous treatment, and the solution used is 80 times more powerful than would be used in an intravenous treatment (3% versus 0.0375%). The embolus that developed was oxygen, not nitrogen, and therefore not life-threatening. However, opponents of the therapy often cite this case, saying it proves that hydrogen peroxide therapy can cause dangerous embolisms.
Yale Medical School investigators reported three cases of ulcerative colitis following the administration of hydrogen peroxide enemas (not intravenous treatments), but went on to conclude that peroxide enemas were safe if the concentration of the solution was carefully controlled. [34]
CBS News, The New York Times, and other media sources report that a patient in South Carolina bled to dead five days after receiving an intravenous hydrogen peroxide treatment from her doctor, Dr. James Shortt. Soon afterwards, armed State, County, and Federal agents raided Dr. Shortt's clinic, and reporters published inflammatory headlines like "Prescription for death" and accused the doctor of "injecting rocket fuel" into the patient. [35] The New York Times cited unnamed medical experts that claimed that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that hydrogen peroxide is an effective treatment. It quoted another presumed medical expert who had not heard of the treatment but labeled it "very, very dangerous." [36] The CBS News article, without citing sources, alleged that "If you search the medical literature, you won't find any rigorous scientific studies showing this treatment works. You will, however, find a number of cases in which hydrogen peroxide, used internally, caused fatal embolisms and blood disorders." [37] Ironically, the coroner's report noted that the victim was taking two drugs, Tegretol and Copaxone, prescribed by a different physician, that have side effects that include bruising, infection, bleeding, thrombosis, and liver damage, the exact symptoms found to be the cause of death in the case. [38] Consumer advocate Tim Bolen reported that the media organizations covering the story conducted "no research of their own to determine the validity of the story... Although we provided over thirty highly qualified scientists and doctors to be interviewed - even offering to fly them to New York ... [they also] ignored the fact that over a million recorded intravenous Hydrogen Peroxide treatments have been administered worldwide. Jim Shortt, on camera, in front of Anderson Cooper said 'Anderson, even if this treatment DID cause this woman to die, and it didn't, one death in a million treatments would make Hydrogen Peroxide therapy the SAFEST treatment in the history of medicine,' " but this was excluded from the coverage. [39] William Campbell Douglass II, M.D. and author of Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle, wrote "For decades, I've been a staunch advocate of intravenous hydrogen peroxide... I've used the therapy myself hundreds of times to save countless lives in Africa and other locales. It really is miraculous... The idea that an injection of diluted hydrogen peroxide caused the death of anyone five days after administration is a joke..." [40] R.J. Rowen, M.D., President of the International Oxidative Medicine Association wrote a statement that there was no possible way the half-teaspoon of hydrogen peroxide in a single treatment could have been responsible for the symptoms exhibited by the patient. Ultimately the doctor was cleared of any wrongdoing. However, this case is still cited by opponents of hydrogen peroxide therapy as evidence that the treatment is dangerous and potentially fatal.
Doctors report the most common side effect of intravenous hydrogen peroxide to be inflammation of the vein in which the infusion is given. Factors that determine the likelihood of inflammation include the concentration of the solution, the speed of administration, the size of the vein, the temperature of the solution, and the amount of solution administered. [41] For more information on how to avoid this effect, see members' area.
Why isn't intravenous hydrogen peroxide already in use?
If intravenous hydrogen peroxide shows promise against a critical public health threat like bird flu, why aren't government, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies investigating this treatment or comparing it against antiviral drugs like Tamiflu?
It's important to clarify that hydrogen peroxide therapy, while largely unknown in North America, it is widely used in some countries, including Germany, Russia and even Cuba, where the therapy is an accepted part of mainstream medical practice. [42]
In other countries, there are forces at work that prevent hydrogen peroxide from being brought to a wider population. Some allege that because hydrogen peroxide is so inexpensive and cannot be patented, the treatment is not only unprofitable when compared to patented drugs, but a threat to the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.
"There [are] three very powerful forces fighting the general acceptance of [hydrogen peroxide]. First, the drug industry. H2O2 is not patentable. The drug industry would lose billions in lost drug sales. Second, the FDA [who] works in collusion with the drug industry. They can be counted on to pull every dirty trick imaginable to stop this therapy... The third force is organized medicine. In the face of these momentous experimental results, you would think that doctors would be clamoring for more information... but it doesn't work that way. With most doctors, it's not greed, but pride, ignorance, and bigotry that account for their resistance to new and unusual treatments." - William Campbell Douglass, M.D.
"A major reason for [the] lack of interest in bio-oxidative therapies is that ozone and hydrogen peroxide are non-patentable substances that are very inexpensive to manufacture and use. In Germany, Russia and Cuba, physicians have successfully treated many serious and chronic conditions (including cancer and heart disease) without expensive surgery. The net cost of the materials for a treatment of autohemotherapy or a medical infusion of hydrogen peroxide is under $10... bio-oxidative therapies administered in a medical setting cost up to fifty percent less than traditional therapies, especially for patients suffering from chronic and degenerative diseases. Self-administered treatments by patients themselves... can cost far less. For these reasons, ozone and hydrogen peroxide pose a threat to the continued dominance of the medical establishment: the pharmaceutical industry, medical centers and physicians who are accustomed to providing expensive drugs, complex medical procedures and long hospital stays." [42] - Nathaniel Altman, author of Oxygen Healing Therapies
Writing about hydrogen peroxide therapy, Waves Forest asks rhetorically "...what would happen if a cure was discovered that was completely effective against the vast majority of diseases, ridiculously cheap and plentiful, and in most cases could be self-administered without a physician? Would the current medical establishment welcome a breakthrough that could render 98 per cent of all drugs, testing and disease-related surgery obsolete? What would the response be of the pharmaceutical industrialists, hospital chain owners, health insurance moguls, AMA, and FDA? Would you expect to read or hear such an announcement from any medical journal or media outlet owned by people financially committed to the medical status quo, which is practically all of them? How many want to help their own occupation become unnecessary? ...This is precisely the situation that exists, and the cure has indeed been around for ages. It has been independently reported effective against virtually every disease at one time or another, in thousands of public-domain medical articles, which had never been collected and correlated until recently." [43]
According to one doctor, there are many reasons why the medical establishment does not embrace natural therapies:
"Physicians receive no education in medical school about the merits of natural treatments. Medical meetings and medical journals are heavily subsidized by the pharmaceutical industry so no information about the virtues of natural treatments will be brought forth in these arenas. Review articles about diseases will either omit information about natural therapies or the material about natural treatments will be presented in such a biased or negative way that no physician would want to use it.
Most physicians believe that the only valid therapies are pharmaceutical and everything else is a scam. I was in this camp for more than 30 years.
Powerful governmental agencies exist to protect the earnings of the pharmaceutical industry and are not very interested in the health status of the general populace. Money wins out so dangerous therapies are released on the public without any attempt to prove safety (genetically modified foods, irradiation of food, fluoridation of water, vaccines etc.).
Tax free foundations supposedly concerned about public health set up research studies to disprove the value of natural therapies which is easy to do by using impotent products, stopping the study before sufficient time has elapsed, and using statistics to skew the results. Unfortunately, some research scientists are just like accountants and lawyers and their services can be bought. When these unfavorable results come forth they are widely disseminated on television and other media by skilled public relations experts to convince the public there is no value in the substances they are using. The key to unraveling the truth about these sordid pieces of research lies in discovering whose funds set up the foundation (aluminum, tobacco, agribusiness etc.).
Physicians who decide to try natural substances are forced to learn new skills, which is not easy.
Inertia can be a strong influence... Human nature tends to oppose change so medical advances often take 50 or more years until they are implemented.
...alternative medical practitioners have been badly harassed by governmental authorities... forcing them to leave the country or defend themselves in expensive lawsuits to avoid losing their licenses. A leader in natural health, Dr. Jonathan Wright, had his office ransacked by Gestapo-like federal agents who seized all his patient records.
There is a legal concept that is widely appreciated by physicians as a way to avoid lawsuits. This concept is you are at risk if you are using treatments that your colleagues are not using. Naturally this impedes change!
In the light of all the negative influences mentioned above it is not surprising that so few M.D.s and other practitioners have embraced natural therapies." [44] - Dr. James Howenstine, M.D.
Public trust in the system
Most people trust in the government and the public health care authorities to address public health issues. They rely on the media, their doctor, and the government to take care of them and keep them informed. As a result, the clinical evidence supporting the use of hydrogen peroxide in treating bird flu will likely continue to remain hidden to all but the few who take the initiative to do their own research.
In an article on hydrogen peroxide, Ron Kennedy, M.D. writes: "Those who refuse to educate themselves, never read, never try anything out of the mainstream of thought and insist on thoughtlessly following the "expert's advice," will pay through the nose for therapies which drain their resources and deliver half-baked results. It may be there is a segment of the population which is capable of nothing more. God bless those folks. Here is this doctor's advice: think for yourself." [45]
PART 2 - How to Survive the Coming Bird Flu Pandemic
Jim Avila and Meredith Ramsey. Renowned Bird Flu Expert Warns: Be Prepared
Thomas Blair. Linus Pauling: Nobel Laureate For Peace and Chemistry
Albert Szent-Györgyi, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1937
Matthias Rath, MD
Emjae Johnson. Healing News: Scientific Research Ignored By The Medical Industry Still Remains Undisputed
[ The #1 Killer: Heart Disease]
[Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, Vol 16, No 4, Fourth Quarter, 2000, p 248-250.]
Dr. Andrew Saul. Vitamin C Therapeutics
Patrick Quillin Ph.D., R.D. The Strategy, Why the Plan Works.
The Arthritis Trust of America. Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy: Supplement to The Art of Getting Well.
11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Oliver TH, Cantab BC, Murphy DV. Influenza Pneumonia: The Intravenous Injection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Lancet 1920;1:432-433.
12.1 12.2 12.3 Brian Handwerk for National Geographic News. "Bird Flu" Similar to Deadly 1918 Flu, Gene Study Finds
13.1 13.2 13.3 Magne, R. Vargas. Vitamin C in treatment of influenza. El Dia Medico 35:1714-1715.
14.1 14.2 [Renker K, Wegner S. Vitamin C-Prophylaxe in der Volkswertf Stralsund. Deutsche Gesundheitswesen 1954;9:702–6.]
15.1 15.2 15.3 [Virus Pneumonia and Its Treatment with Vitamin C. Dr. Frederick R. Klenner. Journal of Southern Medicine and Surgery, February 1948.]
16.1 16.2 16.3 The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C. Robert Landwehr.
17.1 17.2 Lendon H. Smith, M.D. Clinical Guide to the Use of Vitamin C
18.1 18.2 18.3 [Gorton HC, Jarvis K. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Oct;22(8):530-3.]
Tamiflu® Medicine Guide
Drugs would be useless in face of bird flu pandemic - expert
Qi Chen and others. Pharmacologic ascorbic acid concentrations selectively kill cancer cells: Action as a pro-drug to deliver hydrogen peroxide to tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) September 20, 2005 vol. 102 no. 38 13604-13609
William Campbell Douglass, MD. Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle.
Ed McCabe. Flood your Body with Oxygen.
William Campbell Douglass. Hydrogen Peroxide: Medical Miracle. pg. 48-49
25.1 25.2 Candice Kissinger, Karen Cadle and Chester Duda. Online Monitoring of Hydrogen Peroxide in Freely Moving Rodents.
26.1 26.2 Michael Reth. Hydrogen peroxide as second messenger in lymphocyte activation.
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Questions & Answers: Preventing the Flu: What kills influenza virus?
American Cancer Society website. Oxygen Therapy.
29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 Cancer Prevention Coalition Calls for An Economic Boycott of the American Cancer Society.
Samuel S. Epstein M.D. American Cancer Society: The World's Wealthiest "Nonprofit" Institution
Rochus Börner, Ph.D. Politics and Suppression in the "War on Cancer"
Lauren Elaine Berk. The American Cancer Society: Preventing Cancer or Protecting Big Business?
William Campbell Douglass, MD. Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle. page 33
William Campbell Douglass, MD. Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle. pages 33-34
Tim Bolen. The Long Story About Jim Shortt.
Adam Liptak. Death Puts Spotlight on a Doctor and Regulators
A Prescription For Death? Did Alternative Treatment Lead To Patient's Death?
Chris Gupta. Hydrogen Peroxide Doesn't Kill Patients, Drugs Do!
So, You Didn't Like the "60 Minutes" Jim Shortt MD Story...
William Campbell Douglass II, M.D. The Peroxide Pariah.
William Campbell Douglass, MD. Hydrogen Peroxide - Medical Miracle. page 35
42.1 42.2 Nathaniel Altman. Medical Miracle or Health-Care Hoax? Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide in Healing.
Waves Forest. AIDS, Cancer Cured by Hyper-Oxygenation.
Dr. James Howenstine, M.D. Why Do Americans Have Such Poor Health?
Ron Kennedy, M.D. Intravenous Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy.

Brief Disclaimer
Due the various government agencies regulating free speech in health and medicine, The Center for Truth in Medicine cannot say if ascorbic acid or H2O2 have any use whatsoever in the treatment of anything. All the views expressed are the personal views of visitors to this website or the quoted individual. Full disclaimer
Retrieved from ""